On 19.9.2013, at 06:34, Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 18.9.2013, at 14:14, Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ... >>> I think that is expected. The bug is in the desktop specific open >>> commands. Since you use none, generic open is used. That is simply a >>> shell function, and does the right thing. >> >> Is there a generic open command in Linux? Why don't we use this instead? >> > > Not really. There is a shell function called open_generic inside of > xdg-open. I believe that's what Suvayu was referring to. But there is > no clean way of calling it, short of pulling it out of the xdg-open > script into a new script: as a general solution, that's hopeless.
All right. Too bad. Thank you. - Carsten > > -- > Nick > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
