Hi Suvayu, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:51:20AM +0200, Sebastien Vauban wrote: >> >> The other solution that I'd see would be using Emacs' own bug tracker (the >> `org' package is already known to them), if that's possible. Anyway, having >> the >> bugs in an Org file seems natural too! > > I think this is a great idea. A combination of an Org file (either > public or private) and the Emacs bug tracker with Org package tags > should be able to handle our needs. > > I see only one potential problem, is there an easy way to subscribe to > only a specific package tag on the Emacs bug tracker? I imagine most > contributors following Org bugs will not be interested in other Emacs > bugs.
I don't know. I guess this should be asked directly to them. Indeed, it'd be good to have a (virtual) newsgroup with only bugs related to `org', like what exists for Stack Overflow. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
