t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
> Then "punctuation" has two senses, one generic and another specific. To
> my mind, the emacs guideline is ambiguous unless there is some
> convention about which sense is meant in this case. I guess it would be
> possible to look at the code to figure this out, but I'm not well
> equipped to do that.
Re-reading the Elisp conventions about keybindings says this:
• Sequences consisting of ‘C-c’ followed by ‘{’, ‘}’, ‘<’, ‘>’, ‘:’
or ‘;’ are also reserved for major modes.
• Sequences consisting of ‘C-c’ followed by any other punctuation
character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major
mode is not absolutely prohibited, but if you do that, the major
mode binding may be shadowed from time to time by minor modes.
So C-c { and C-c } are fine in a major mode.
(And now that C-c : is not used anymore, this gives us one more free
keybinding to reuse.)
--
Bastien
