On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Simon Thum <simon.t...@gmx.de> wrote: > This seems to be a question of objective. Do you want to encode, i.e. > maintain some reversible original in an url no matter what, or do you want > to fix url's which wouldn't otherwise be legal? In the latter case, the > question mark should probably be retained. >
I believe the former. If the user types in a working link, the exporter shouldn't break it. This could be fixed by sprinkling org-url-decode through various backends, but that suggests to me that the problem may be "upstream." Michael
