"R. Michael Weylandt" <michael.weyla...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Simon Thum <simon.t...@gmx.de> wrote: >> This seems to be a question of objective. Do you want to encode, i.e. >> maintain some reversible original in an url no matter what, or do you want >> to fix url's which wouldn't otherwise be legal? In the latter case, the >> question mark should probably be retained. >>
I am not sure, that I understand what you say here. But in case you want to convince me, that exporting non-working links when the user supplies working links is a feature and not a bug, you will have a hard time ;-) - Andreas > > I believe the former. If the user types in a working link, the > exporter shouldn't break it. > > This could be fixed by sprinkling org-url-decode through various > backends, but that suggests to me that the problem may be "upstream." > > Michael
