Hi Alan, Alan Schmitt <alan.schm...@polytechnique.org> writes:
> A suggestion could be to allow any text inside the markers, except for > the marker itself which would need to be escaped. Escaping could take > the form of doubling the marker: > > ~"foo bar"~ --> "foo bar" > ~"foo ~~ bar"~ --> "foo ~ bar" > > As I've not thought this through, I'm pretty sure someone will find a > huge flaw in this suggestion. Well, the huge flaw will never be obvious with such solutions... because the flaw is precisely this: it hides huge flaws. (Do not bother parsing the above, I'm not sure myself.) FWIW here is my gut reaction: I'm not a fan (euphemism) of escaping here, I feel like it adds little value while bumping complexity too much. But exploring it might be worth it, if someone wants to try! -- Bastien
