On 2014-03-29 10:12, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Dnia 2014-03-28, o godz. 10:59:43
Rick Frankel <r...@rickster.com> napisaƂ(a):

On 2014-03-28 10:01, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
> Rick Frankel wrote:
> BTW, i used "[&nbsp;]" for the unchecked box (we use the same for
> checked and trans)... I think i'll change the unchecked box to
> &#x2610; to match the checked box (same as sachua).
Wouldn't it be better to have (maybe in addition) three distinct
classes for the <li> elements with checkboxes in various states?  This
would make styling them with CSS possible.

Nice idea. I'll look at adding classes to each (checked, or transient)
=li=. I think that the use of classes is minimal due to the orginal
stand-alone (inline css) nature of the html exporter. I certainly
agree that more modern html output is desireable, but it's a big


Reply via email to