Hello, Daniel Clemente <n142...@gmail.com> writes:
> „Related thread“: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/82923 > > I don't see in there any argument to have midword links, it's > presented as a consequence of other patch. I didn't say there was an argument there. I just pointed out that your report was a known fact and that it was discussed elsewhere. > I have notes about programs I tried, like <<<R>>>, <<<at>>> or > <<<ps>>>, <<<C>>>, <<<CR>>> vs <<<LF>>> vs <<<CRLF>>>, 3-letter stock > tickers, … so now I'm seeing blue links everywhere in the middle of > words. I can get used to it, but it's ugly and not useful. I can understand that. > Can't we break at non-letters? Not at non-„word-constituents“, but at > non-letters. If emacs doesn't provide that concept, better build it. I don't know. Could you define precisely that concept? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou