Hi Nicolas, I've changed all of these, and I will keep testing it over the next few days. I have one question remaining, though.
On 2014-04-25 08:51, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: >> (if (time-less-p nt (current-time)) nt))))) > > This is a matter of taste, but I find one-armed `if' a bit confusing. > Since return value matters, I suggest to use > > (and (time-less-p nt (current-time)) nt) Why not use "(when (time-less-p nt (current-time)) nt)" instead of "and" here? Thanks, Alan
