Hi Alexander, On 2014-04-28 09:20, AW <alexander.will...@t-online.de> writes:
> Am Sonntag, 27. April 2014, 10:09:35 schrieb Alan Schmitt: >> On 2014-04-25 10:02, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: >> > Alan Schmitt <alan.schm...@polytechnique.org> writes: >> >> I guess I should have asked: who decides what goes in contrib? >> > >> > The Org maintainer. Another option is to turn it into an ELPA package. >> >> I need to learn how to do this. In the meantime, I've put the code on >> github: https://github.com/brabalan/org-review >> >> Alan > > I'm really interessted in a more sophisticated review system than to > put "REVIEW" on the list of TODO | DONE items. I guess you are having > a good point here and your code will improve orgmode. > > But after reading your initial post and the README on github I'm not > sure how to use your code. > > Could you complete your Example in the README, please? I've just expanded on the README. Please let me know if you have additional questions. > 1. Probably -- sorry, I'm lacking of lisp understanding -- we need to > put the file org-review.el into a place where Emacs can find it. Yes. > 2. It is probably necessary to add (require 'org-review) before the > code in the example into the ".emacs" file, or am I wrong? Yes, it is necessary. > 3. Usually people have something like > > #+TODO: TODO INPUT ASK MAYBE | DONE > > in their org-file or an equivalent in their .emacs file. What will > happen to such customisations? Nothing. Review tracking is done using properties, not keywords. Best, Alan
