"Charles C. Berry" <ccbe...@ucsd.edu> writes: > As to Thorsten's query: > > ,---- > | what would acutally be the benefit of using RMarkdown over Org-mode, > | or put it another way - when you already use RMarkdown, why do you > | need Org-mode too? And if you use Org-mode, what does RMarkdown add to > | the table? > `---- > > There is some discussion of this in the README.org... > > If you already use org-mode: > > You get access to Sweave, knitr, slidify, pander, et cetera. > > Their `chunk' options (akin to babel header args) can be easier to use > than header args for complicated displays. > > Dependency aware caching of R objects is available in those engines > and its lack in Babel [1] is a serious impediment to working with long > running computations. > > bioConductor vignettes can be authored in org-mode and exported for a > suitable vignette engine. > > If you already use Rmarkdown, etc, you get the ease of editting and > working in org-mode - cycling visibility of headlines, lists, src > blocks, and results, and of storing results inline, previewing latex > fragments, and all. > > HTH,
Yes, definitely, thanks for the info. So it makes sense to add another tool ;) -- cheers, Thorsten