Will do and thanks for the info Charles, John, Thorsten, and Rasmus. On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Charles C. Berry <ccbe...@ucsd.edu> wrote: > On Sat, 1 Nov 2014, Rasmus wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Grant Rettke <g...@wisdomandwonder.com> writes: >> >>> • Does one exist and I missed it? >> >> >> Are you aware of this project? >> >> https://github.com/chasberry/orgmode-accessories >> >> —Rasmus > > > > Thanks for this, Rasmus. > > Grant, > > If ox-ravel is something you are interested, I recommend that you > tryout the `ravel-lang' branch. In addition to the examples in the > master branch, there is `demos.org' with some simple examples. > > As to Thorsten's query: > > ,---- > | what would acutally be the benefit of using RMarkdown over Org-mode, > | or put it another way - when you already use RMarkdown, why do you > | need Org-mode too? And if you use Org-mode, what does RMarkdown add to > | the table? > `---- > > There is some discussion of this in the README.org... > > If you already use org-mode: > > You get access to Sweave, knitr, slidify, pander, et cetera. > > Their `chunk' options (akin to babel header args) can be easier to use > than header args for complicated displays. > > Dependency aware caching of R objects is available in those engines and its > lack in Babel [1] is a serious impediment to working with long running > computations. > > bioConductor vignettes can be authored in org-mode and exported for a > suitable vignette engine. > > If you already use Rmarkdown, etc, you get the ease of editting and > working in org-mode - cycling visibility of headlines, lists, src > blocks, and results, and of storing results inline, previewing latex > fragments, and all. > > HTH, > > Chuck > > [1] Yes, I do know that there is a :cache header arg.
-- Grant Rettke g...@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ “Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates ((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x))) “Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously.” --Thompson
