Nicolas Richard <theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr> writes:

> Consider the following line:
> <2015-02-13 ven.> (10h-13h)
> Hiting C-c . RET with point on the timestamp gives
> <2015-02-13 ven. -13h> (10h-13h)
> which is not expected.

It should now be fixed.

> Please consider the patch below

Thank you for the patch. However, I applied something different.


Nicolas Goaziou

Reply via email to