Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: >> <2015-02-13 ven.> (10h-13h) >> >> Hiting C-c . RET with point on the timestamp gives >> <2015-02-13 ven. -13h> (10h-13h) >> >> which is not expected. > > It should now be fixed. > Thanks, works great so far (unlike my own patch, which would fail in some situations).
-- Nicolas
