...and of course, immediately sending, I noticed a small problem in the
grammar:
Richard Lawrence <richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu> writes:
> - A PARENTHETICAL-CITATION is either a SIMPLE-PARENTHETICAL or a
> CITATION-LIST whose first INDIVIDUAL-REFERENCE is a
> PARENTHESIZED-KEY
> - An IN-TEXT-CITATION is either a SIMPLE-IN-TEXT, or a
> CITATION-LIST whose first INDIVIDUAL-REFERENCE is a BARE-KEY.
In both of these clauses, `INDIVIDUAL-REFERENCE is' should be
`INDIVIDUAL-REFERENCE contains', so that they read:
- A PARENTHETICAL-CITATION is either a SIMPLE-PARENTHETICAL or a
CITATION-LIST whose first INDIVIDUAL-REFERENCE contains a
PARENTHESIZED-KEY
- An IN-TEXT-CITATION is either a SIMPLE-IN-TEXT, or a
CITATION-LIST whose first INDIVIDUAL-REFERENCE contains a BARE-KEY.
Also, I wanted to mention that people may want to start by reading the
examples in the proposal, which are under the heading ``Examples of main
citation syntax''. (There are further, unofficial examples under the
heading ``Syntax for extensions''.)
Best,
Richard
