Sebastien Vauban <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@public.gmane.org> writes:
> Question: are the level-1 headlines always visible, all of them I mean? > I know that's the case as of now, but wondered if it'd be good to hide > the ones which are not significant. Not a very sharp advice on this, > though. I have no strong opinion about this, but I think it would be odd if they were invisible. After all, this is the basic structure of the document. >> "if required"/"if needed" means the entry will only be shown if point is >> within the entry (i.e., not on the headline). Thus, for example, >> `canonical' and `full' only differ when match is on a headline, since >> only latter will show the entry. >> >> I think this is enough, but I can add more views if needed. >> >> WDYT? > > My /personal/ preference is to see the ancestors, so that I can know > which path lead to the entry, and avoid confusion in case some "sub sub > sections" are repeated in many different "sub sections". > > With your proposal, I then only have the choice between `lineage', > `full' and `canonical', while I'd like something which would give me: > > * H1 * H2 ** Sub 2 *** Sub sub 2 Text > > WDYT? I can add `ancestors' view, which would basically be `lineage' without siblings. Regards,
