Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes:
> it would be good to also have semi-canonical [i.e.
> canonical-without-ancestor-body-text], where ancestor nodes do not
> show body text. text can obscure structure. i use this view for
> blogs. otherwise i'd have to make fake headlines just to hide text.
I don't understand. Body text is not shown in ancestors. Considering the
following buffer:
* Grandmother
** Uncle
*** Heir
** Father
Ancestor text
*** Sister
Sibling text
*** Self
Match
**** First born
Child text
**** The other child
*** Brother
** Aunt
`canonical' view is
* Grandmother
** Uncle
** Father
*** Sister
*** Self
Match
**** First born
**** The other child
*** Brother
** Aunt
> does full show the entry below the headline that point is on? i
> wouldn't use this view if it is not canonical [i.e. does not show
> children also].
`full', as its name suggests, shows complete subtree: all children and
their contents.
> do we presume that the entire buffer's visibility is changed for
> showing context, or are things that already shown left showing?
`canonical' change visibilty in subtree, so some parts of it could be
hidden in the process. Other views only augment current visibility.
Regards,
