Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: >> My guess would be that most notes are short. For such notes, but not >> necessarily for longer notes, [@:NOTE] would be more convenient. > > This is very limited: you cannot write two paragraphs in your note.
Fine whit me. For that I I have inlinetasks. >> Though I don't know what the "@" signifies. > > AnnoTate? I did not see that coming. That's a "meh" from me :) >> I think whatever is the value of #+TODO makes more sense as prefixes. > > You turn every annotation into a task. Again, this is very restrictive. I don't think so, e.g. #+TODO: DISCUSS DISAGREE | RESOLVED DROPPED And judging from the manual people are doing much more complicated stuff than that (my usage is pretty simple). > Since you're talking about "TODO functionality", what features would > this share with regular tasks, defined with headlines or inlinetasks? The tags. They are notes related to say a sentence, so you put a note at the end of a sentence. Spatial TODOs. > Anyway, we're speaking of two different things, e.g., I think it's > important to be able to mark exactly which part of the document you're > annotating. I agree they are different. > [TODO: ...] cannot do that. Its virtues are compactness, being similar to a list, being C-k friendly, and, IMO, more intuitive. –Rasmus -- There are known knowns; there are things we know that we know