On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:09:16 +0200, Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, it's just an expression -- for the standard font-lock faces there > > are variable names that are _exactly_ the same as the face names, > > which evaluate to the corresponding face name. > > Yes, that was what I was referring to. But as only the font-lock > faces and not the standard faces provide these variables, wouldn't it > make sense to encourage the use of expressions and deprecate the use > of symbols?
?? The "symbols" are expressions. Do you mean "encourage the use of quoted face names instead of using the corresponding variable?" I think that makes sense. > AUCTeX is using both a defface and a defvar for defining its faces as > well. But if only expressions are used in `font-lock-keywords', I can > get rid of the defvars. I'd say it's silly to keep around both. -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
