Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Would you please try tumme and see if you like it?
> > We may remove thumbs since tumme is intended as the replacement.
>
> Please don't remove thumbs which is simpler than tumme, and IMHO works better
Yes, I think in this case it makes sense to have a "lite" package -
especially for beginners - with few basic functionalities but
immediate gratification, so to say. And an advanced package, in this
case tumme, which I think has much more potential (to be better, after
I had some extended twiddling around).
> with small sets of images. I will get this to work if no-one else is
> interested.
Well, I can't help with coding, but I could at least cross check your
improvements on my system.
>
> Nick
--
Best wishes
Dieter Wilhelm
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
