I think what Richard is getting at, is that load-suffixes should be what you
call basic-load-suffixes and what you think of as load-suffixes should be
recomputed on-the-fly when needed.
Yes. That is cleaner.
As for me, I think that even in such a case, load-suffixes should not be
customizable: if people really want to use other extensions than .el and
.elc I see no reason why they should be able to do it via customize rather
than via a good old setq. It sounds to me like a rather unusual situation.
I guess you're right. So we don't need to make this customizable.
However, the change above remains a good idea to make things cleaner.
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
