> Er, yes. I already wrote what I see - descriptions such as this:
> "Character set Big5 (Level-1) A141-C67F"
> I'm picking up the keys by mapping over the keymaps
accessible from the
> global-map (in emacs -q, for example). There are tons of such
keys for which
> `single-key-description' gives a description such as I have indicated.
I believe there is a confusion then: those bindings are not for specific
characters but for so-called "generic characters" which cover a whole
charset at a time. So the description is correct in the sense
that which is
bound is the whole charset rather than just one of the chars.
Right - Handa has explained that. Actually, IIUC, it is not the whole char
set, but just a generic char that is bound to self-insert-command. So, the
single-key description could be more precise and mention the character
group, but it cannot, in any case, describe a single character. I didn't
understand that originally.
It does
suffer from the bug you mentioned, tho: it can't be parsed back by kbd.
Yes, and, from what I think I understand, maybe it shouldn't be bound to
self-insert-command - see my previous email.
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
