I made pp-eval-expression use X instead of x,
and then I made all use of X read the way eval-expression does.

One thing I am not sure of is whether to do the same thing to x.
allout.el uses x to read objects that are not anything like
Lisp expressions, so perhaps it is undesirable to use
read-expression-map for that.

    allout.el:4891:  (interactive "xExposure spec: ")
    allout.el:4986:  (interactive "xExposure spec: ")

Ken, what do you think?


_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug

Reply via email to