Juanma Barranquero wrote:
On 12/29/06, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be very good if we continued this discussion.
And if no agreement can be reached, will you add another patch to your
binary Emacs distribution and make it still more divergent, or will
you accept that perhaps it is better to leave it as it stands now?
I have already said I agreed. Somehow I misunderstood the problem
thinking that keyboard layout was involved. It is not and I really do
not understand why I thought that.
Sorry for the trouble, but at least I know now how Emacs works in this
area and why the choice was made. It would probably be good if it was
explained in the manual.
I have no intention of making my Emacs binary distribution be different
from Emacs default if I can avoid it. On the other hand there are still
bugs I know about that affects the w32 side mostly. I will tell as soon
as I get time. I have made no patches for those bugs and would be glad
if we fixed them instead.
The purpose of my binary distribution was (as I several times has said)
to make it more easy to get Emacs up and running on w32. I was surprised
that it was so difficult and time consuming. I know it is not a very
high priority to make this easier, mostly because of lack of resources.
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
