On 1/22/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However the real question was of course if the same obarray is used for
symbols created by let variable declarations (did I get everything right
now?;-) as for symbols created by "defvar" variables.
(progn
(defvar my-sym t)
(put 'my-sym 'my-prop t)
(let (my-sym)
(message "symbol: %S -- property: %S" my-sym (get 'my-sym 'my-prop))))
=> "symbol: nil -- property: t"
If `let' interned a new symbol in another obarray, the above would
answer: "symbol: nil -- property: nil". That would be very surprising.
A function call at arbitrary deep doesn't usually care whether a
symbol it's using was let-bound or not, only its value and other
properties. `let' is not advertised as binding anything other than a
symbol's value...
/L/e/k/t/u
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
