>> If cua-mode is enabled and you define a minor mode using C-c as a
>> prefix key you describe-bindings wrongly says that C-c is
>> shadowed. This is quite disturbing since C-c by some of the
>> punctuation characters is what a minor mode is supposed to use (my
>> example uses C-c RET which is a bit bad). Here is how the output can
>> look:
>>
>> key binding
>> --- -------
>>
>> C-c Prefix Command
>> (that binding is currently shadowed by another mode)
>>
> Here is a patch which fixes this problem. I'm not sure whether it
> has any bad effects in other cases. Stefan?
I'm not very familiar with this code, actually.
But it doesn't look quite right. I believe the test
!(KEYMAPP (definition) && KEYMAPP (tem))
should be done outside the other `if', so that it also prevents using
`continue' if mention_shadow is 0. OTOH in the case of EQ (tem, definition)
we still want to continue unconditionally.
Also, I'm not quite sure how this code handles the recursion in sub-keymaps,
so maybe I'm talking nonesense.
Stefan
PS: The "*/" on a separate line is not the style used in Emacs's C code
usually, so I'd rather not introduce it here.
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
