Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > !(KEYMAPP (definition) && KEYMAPP (tem)) > > should be done outside the other `if', so that it also prevents using > `continue' if mention_shadow is 0. OTOH in the case of EQ (tem, definition) > we still want to continue unconditionally.
Seems right -- I've checked in a different change. -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
