Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see why the insertion of the initial scratch message should be
> conditional on which buffer happens to be current at that point in the
> start-up sequence.
>
> It makes sense to me. If your init file sets up other buffers, Emacs
> should let you see them, right?
Actually this is not what this is about. There seems to be a confusion
with the splash screen. The point here is that the *scratch* buffer is
empty. (Where it is in the buffer list does not matter.) You could
argue that there is no point in a *scratch* buffer, if desktop
reverted a session. But in that case it shouldn't exist at all.
Even if you discount my wacky attachment for the scratch message, it
*is* a little bit puzzling why the *scratch* buffer is empty in that
case and because the reason is not evident (to me it still isn't) it
*does* seem a little bit as if Emacs were in an inconsistent state
after restoring the desktop.
Oliver
--
Oliver Scholz 21 Ventôse an 215 de la Révolution
Ostendstr. 61 Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité!
60314 Frankfurt a. M.
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
