"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It has not been my intent. I do get a bit upset by some type of > answers and you are right, it is then in the eye of the beholder. I > can understand if Eli feel a bit hurt. He took long time to write a > long answer and I just pointed to some a little bit weaker points in > the answer.
IMO, there are _no weak points_ in Eli's message. In one sentence: "All software have bugs, so to ever make a release, someone must decide when enough is enough". Sadly RMS does not see it that way either ... so we'll probably never see a release, no matter how close we get to one (unless of course, people stop reporting bugs in the pretests, even when they find one). > I try to have respect for that more economic reasoning that you are > using, Eli talked about management - not economics. -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
