> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:57:44 +0200 > From: "Juanma Barranquero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > > On 4/16/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Then what arguments are actually convincing to you? > > At this point in time, just days short of the intented release? Either > the bug crashes Emacs, or it does cause trouble for some really major > package, or it is very common and/or confusing for many users.
And such bugs are almost unthinkable at this stage, given the long pretest -- unless, that is, they were caused by unsafe changes we did very recently, on one of the occasions we failed to exercise will power and resist the temptation of fixing ``one more bug''. But let me turn the table around, Lennart, and ask you: what arguments will actually convince _you_ to change your mind on this? Following Karl Popper, if your answer is ``nothing will change my mind'', then this is a religious type of argument that we should just stop, because it has no hope of any agreement whatsoever. _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
