> of hoping to avoid this issue for a while, but now that Francesco said > that rcp.el should be able to use *both* rcp *and* scp, the whole I'm still wondering what is the point of allowing rsh and ssh. ssh can do anything rsh can, so if you have ssh, why use rsh ? Stefan
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults change Edward J. Sabol
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults change Kai . Grossjohann
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults change Francesco Potorti`
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults change Edward J. Sabol
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults cha... Nelson Minar
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults... Francesco Potorti`
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults... Kai . Grossjohann
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, def... Stefan Monnier
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change,... Kai . Grossjohann
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name cha... Stefan Monnier
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name cha... Kai . Grossjohann
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name cha... Francesco Potorti`
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name cha... Stefan Monnier
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name cha... Francesco Potorti`
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name cha... Stefan Monnier
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults change Kai . Grossjohann
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults cha... Martin Pool
- Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults... Kai . Grossjohann