[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > So the commands of Basb process A and those of Basb process B would be > > interspersed in the history? And as you go forward and back in the > > history in Bash process B, you would see A's commands and B's commands > > in chronological order? > Yes. ZSH does implement this well IME (but I haven't used ZSH > extensively.. so I'm not sure if I'd run into trouble with it). > > That makes a kind of sense, but what I would envision is that each > > Bash process has its own history with only the commands of that process. > Some do prefer that. It'd be reasonable to do that by default, as it's > currently the default. It seems fine to support both modes and let each user choose. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) --- via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
