* Rudolf Adamkovič <rud...@adamkovic.org> [2025-05-15 14:34]:
> All I meant to say is:
> 
> The original question cannot be answered objectively unless the key term
> "innovation" is defined with sufficient precision.  Until then, everyone
> is subjectively correct, per their own definition of the term.

You assume that "everyone" has their own definition. In that case I would just 
say go and look up the definition! 

Imagine we speak of metallurgy and everyone has their own definition,
where does this move? For that reason there are books, dictionaries,
schools and univerisities, we cannot be arguing about individual lack
of knowledge and arguing about non-existent and not-used definitions. 

We argue only about known and well defined definitions.

ISO TC 279 in the standard ISO 56000:2020 defines innovation as "a new or 
changed entity, realizing or redistributing value".

Here are some examples across different categories:

1. Product Innovation (New or Changed Entity)
---------------------------------------------

- Example: Tesla's electric vehicles (EVs) introduced a shift from
  combustion engines to sustainable transportation, creating value
  through reduced emissions and high performance.

- Example: Smartphones with foldable screens (e.g., Samsung Galaxy Z
  Fold) introduced a new form factor, redistributing value in the
  mobile industry.

2. Service Innovation (New or Changed Entity)
---------------------------------------------

- Example: Netflix transitioning from DVD rentals to a streaming
  service, creating value through convenience and on-demand
  entertainment.

- Example: Uber’s ride-hailing platform introduced a new way to access
  transportation, redistributing value from traditional taxis to a
  digital marketplace.

3. Process Innovation (Changed Entity)
--------------------------------------

- Example: Amazon’s use of robotics in warehouses improved efficiency
  in order fulfillment, creating value through faster delivery times.

- Example: 3D printing in manufacturing allows for rapid prototyping,
  redistributing value by reducing production costs and time.

4. Business Model Innovation (New or Changed Entity)
----------------------------------------------------

- Example: Airbnb’s peer-to-peer lodging model disrupted the hotel
  industry by redistributing value from traditional accommodations to
  home-sharing.

- Example: Subscription-based models (e.g., Adobe Creative Cloud)
  shifted from one-time software purchases to recurring revenue,
  creating long-term customer value.

5. Organizational Innovation (Changed Entity)
---------------------------------------------

- Example: Google’s "20% time" policy (allowing employees to spend
  time on side projects) led to innovations like Gmail, creating value
  through employee-driven ideas.

- Example: Remote work tools (e.g., Zoom, Slack) became essential
  during the COVID-19 pandemic, redistributing value from
  office-centric to distributed work models.

Each of these examples aligns with ISO 56000's definition by
introducing something new or changed that generates or shifts value
for businesses, customers, or society.

-- 
Jean Louis

---
via emacs-tangents mailing list 
(https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
              • ... Madhu
              • ... Jean Louis
              • ... Van Ly via Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists
      • ... Rudolf Adamkovič
        • ... Jean Louis
          • ... Rudolf Adamkovič
        • ... Rudolf Adamkovič
          • ... Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
            • ... Rudolf Adamkovič
              • ... Rudolf Adamkovič
              • ... Jean Louis
              • ... Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
              • ... Jean Louis
              • ... Rudolf Adamkovič
              • ... Richard Stallman
              • ... Van Ly via Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists
          • ... Jean Louis
  • ... Richard Stallman
    • ... Pyromania via Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists

Reply via email to