On 7/16/04, Chris wrote: >I still don't understand why I didn't get it. If it made it to the >digest, that means it had to be processed by the list. Unless the list >server is doing some kind of spam filtering (quite possible), then >everyone on the list should have gotten it. The exception being those >that run spam filters of their own (which, really they still got it, only >their filters caught it and kept it away from them).
and on 7/15/04 Virginia Wittmann wrote: >FWIW here's a part of the headers: >Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 21:15:58 -0700 >X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ..com> I'm no expert on header-reading, but does that X-Authentication... line look to anyone else like a possible forged header? Maybe the spammer found a way into the Eskimo.Com server using forger headers that fool the server into thinking it's a legitimate CE List email? Regardless of how, they're still jerks (spammers - porn or just commercial). (IMNSHO) My 0.02, Jim Rohde ___________________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe send a mail message with a SUBJECT line of "unsubscribe" to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
