I guess the P6 should be generic enough... I searched a lot but no definite answer, other than the Atom uses SSE2, so "P6" should have enough performance and compatibility with all architectures (the default on many builds). These are important ((only?)) to make performance optimisations for a specific architecture (tailor-made) and Atom is very limited in all aspects, not sure if there is a setting for that yet. but P6 setting was used on other architectures taht had not their specific tag at that time.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Eric H. Johnson <ejohn...@camalytics.com> wrote: > Mario, > >>> Marion, << > > Oops, sorry, I work with a Marion and couldn't stop my fingers. > > Sincere apologies. > > Regards, > Eric > > That is why I noted it in my post. I knew I was not supposed to use the > 386/486... selection, but not sure of which one to use. Core2 seemed like > the only one that was close. A Google search did find this post, which also > indicates to use the Core 2 entry: > http://fixunix.com/setup/532919-intel-atom-kernel-configuration.html > > Do you know which entry to use? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
