Viesturs Lācis wrote: > Out of curiosity I tried to find results for D510 and D525 boards - > they both are mentioned in the list of tested systems. > > This is D510: > https://www.osadl.org/Latency-plot-of-system-in-rack-1-slot.qa-latencyplot-r1s4.0.html?latencies=&showno=&slider=228 > > This is D525: > https://www.osadl.org/Latency-plot-of-system-in-rack-4-slot.qa-latencyplot-r4s7.0.html?latencies=&showno=&slider=228 > > > Where did they get 4 cores? From hyperthreading? Do I understand > correctly that disabling hyperthreading should improve latency > figures? Yup, the D510 is a CATASTROPHE, the D525 is just really bad. You could probably run a servo machine on the D525, but it isn't real good. Yes, I think the extra "CPUs" are from hyperthreading, and disabling it should help.
Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Ways to Improve & Secure Unified Communications Unified Communications promises greater efficiencies for business. UC can improve internal communications as well as offer faster, more efficient ways to interact with customers and streamline customer service. Learn more! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426253/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
