On Oct 25, 2011, at 15:40 , Kent A. Reed wrote: > On 10/25/2011 9:56 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: >> Hi folks, Michael Haberler pointed out that it's a bit confusing to have >> the .lyx doc source files in 2.5, since they are not used there any >> more. We've (mostly?) transitioned to asciidoc, which has the matching >> .txt files as their source. >> >> Is it time to remove the old .lyx files from 2.5? I don't know the doc >> transition status well enough to say, and I'd appreciate y'all's input. >> >> > Rather than "disappearing" them, Why not park them in a suitably named > dead-end branch? That way they are available to anyone who really wants to > check something in them later without cluttering the landscape for everyone > else.
That dead-end branch is called "v2.4_branch". ;-) Nothing would be lost, it just won't clutter up the 2.5 and newer branches. -- Sebastian Kuzminsky ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
