agreed.  That was the motivation behind lcnc (which as noted is already 
taken).

On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 05:39:51 -0600, John Thornton wrote:
> I prefer the shorter names xcnc, cncrsh, tkcnc whenever possible.
>
> Thanks
> John
>
> On 1/20/2012 12:54 PM, Jeff Epler wrote:
>>
>>
>> Right now in the v2.5_branch of development, we have
>>      linuxcnc    [the main program]
>>      xlinuxcnc   [the Xaw-based GUI]
>>      linuxcncrsh [the program we're talking about now]
>>      tklinuxcnc  [the Tk-based GUI]
>>
>> unix command names are generally lowercase, so it's 'linuxcnc' 
>> rather than
>> 'LinuxCNC' there.
>>
>> If we were to shorten them up, maybe it should be "cnc" in command 
>> names
>> (xcnc, cncrsh, tkcnc).
>>
>> "lcnc" and "lnc" are both used as marketing names by other cnc 
>> control
>> manufacturers; I'd be pretty reluctant to use these as command names 
>> in
>> LinuxCNC.
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft 
> developers
> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, 
> MVC3,
> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to