Kim, this shouldnt be hard to do (where's the linuxcnc volunteer force when we need them ;)
however it's strictly an interpreter lexical issue since the N-numbers are ignored anyway, and have no bearing on the semantics of sloc's/source context -m Am 23.03.2012 um 06:56 schrieb Kim Kirwan: > Hi Michael, > > This is probably the wrong place to mention this, but... > > It would be great if at some point LinuxCNC (LCNC?) could > also accept (in g-code) N-numbers ranging from (at least) > N0 (N0000.000) to N9999.999. This would allow Autocon/Dynapath > control users to load their existing g-code into LCNC > without N-number modification. > > Sorry, I know you are working above this level, but > the subject of your post reminded me to mention this. > > Thanks for all your hard work on straightening out LCNC. > > Kim > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF email is sponsosred by: > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
