On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 02:58:32AM +0000, Chris Morley wrote: > What is the best fix considering user with a custom HAL file using the > signals? > I was thinking the signal name should be spindle-on for the spindle PWM > then change: > if ON in outputs and not pwm: > for the spindle-on signal.
If I understand right, this sounds fine. It only changes the case that would currently be an error, and leaves the other cases alone. > If that is agreeable should I fix 2.4 to be merged up? Yes. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
