On 4/12/2012 9:56 PM, EBo wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:49:55 -0500, Jon Elson wrote: >> Kenneth Lerman wrote: >>> I guess your style is more subtle than mine. >>> >>> I think I would just record everything whether or not it changed. >>> Hmmm... if we store 1000 bytes at each step for a million (executed) >>> line program. That's "only" a gig. Small potatoes by today's >>> standards. >>> >> Remember that this stuff has to be processed in near-real time. >> Anything that greatly slows >> down the interpreter or trajectory planner is not going to be seen as >> a >> universal improvement. > and it cost time to write anything to either memory or to disk -- > although memory is typically at least an order of magnitude faster than > disk... Since we generally get disk transfer rates on the order of tens of megabytes per second, I don't see that as impacting our performance.
Ken > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. > Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. > Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
