On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 17:49:02 +0200, Michael Haberler wrote: > Am 08.08.2012 um 17:44 schrieb EBo: >>> >>> [I have to admit, I have NOT read the details of the various >>> licenses >>> in >>> a long time, so I might be all wet.] >> >> Has anyone thought of communicating with zeromq to see if they would >> entertain GPLv2 or later? If so, it is possible to take the GPLv2 >> only >> and do the same? > > I read up a bit on Piet's stance on licensing, and one statement I > read made quite clear he's adamant about it, and no changes please, > period. > > Seems they had their series of internal battles, too > > so - asking wont hurt, but I feel a certain answer coming back
Then we cannot realistically use it. period. So it all depends. I understand choosing a license for external reasons (I chose the AGPL - which closes the "cloud hole" - when an IP lawyer at UConn started playing games so they could take control of my thesis work...) EBo -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
