On 12 August 2012 16:53, Peter C. Wallace <p...@mesanet.com> wrote: >> There is no thread-based interpretation of "net" commands, though, so >> I don't know if there is any other way to do it.
> Do you mean which thread actuates the statement? What I meant was that there is no code that runs every thread as the result of a "net" statement. The only HAL statements that cause code to run every thread are the "addf" statements. AFAIK the "net" statement just makes all the pins share a single address in shared memory. If you were to make mathematical and logical operators create implicit HAL components then it is not clear which thread they should go in or in which sequence. It is worth noting that in the graphical packages such as Simulink and LabView the mathematica operators are themselves blocks. (I actually prefer the idea of HAL being graphically programmed to any of the other ideas so far, but I used to code LabView for pay) -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
