On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:07:10PM +0200, andy pugh wrote:
> On 16 August 2012 15:58, SourceForge.net <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Emc could benefit from a tapping cycle that does not rely on a spindle 
> > encoder but instead uses floating taping heads.
> 
> How does that work? Do you have to assume that spindle speed is
> approximately correct, and not care too much about the tapping depth?
> 
> Or is this for use with the friction-reversing heads? (though I still
> wouln't know how to control depth)

For a tension/compression tapping head, the cycle would need to
reverse the spindle at the bottom, and the feed and speed would need
to be matched proportionally according to the pitch.  It's tricky to
track during the reversal, especially if your spindle doesn't
accelerate very fast.

For a reversing tapping head, they are much more forgiving.  You can
always feed too slowly, and the clutch in the tapping head slips.  The
spindle doesn't reverse.  The forward and reverse gearings in the
tapping head are different (but the ratios are different on different
models of head), so on reversal you can feed faster by some ratio.

Both styles give very approximate depth control and you really ought
not use them on blind holes if you need to get close to the bottom.

They are both tricky to use.  I recommend writing a subroutine that
takes the pitch and depth as an argument, and handles all the magic
ratios for one's particular tapping head.

I suppose you could fake the encoder feedback and use the rigid tap
cycle with a T/C head, but I haven't tried this.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to