Robert Ellenberg wrote: > In particular, I'm curious about > potential conflicts with spindle-synchronized motion, and if the simulation > provides a means to test CSS moves and rigid tapping. > For rigid tapping (G33.1) the trajectory planner is at the mercy of the spindle. You can't plan for something that is controlled by external events. The machine builder needs to make sure the spindle reverses gradually enough that the Z axis can follow it.
For single point threading, then things are much more under the control of the trajectory planner, as large speed changes of the spindle would be an anomaly. Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
