On 5 November 2013 16:20, Michael Haberler <[email protected]> wrote:
> How does your reference to "NIST Logic" add up with the fact that we can run > several NML-based UI's in parallel today? and how would that be different to > this proposal? It doesn't add up. which is why I was trying to find out what "NIST logic" is, and why we choose to ignore it sometimes (if, in fact, we do) > could it be that this is just some major misunderstanding what this is about? No, I know what it is about, and I am all in favour of it, I was just pointing out something that I am unclear on that might warrant consideration. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
