On 6 November 2013 10:38, Michael Haberler <[email protected]> wrote:
> the key problem I see with this idea is: one cannot determine the pin > direction just because the pin is named in a net statement; there might be > several net commands to link more pins to the same signal and one would have > to look at the complete set Aren't the pins still created at some point by the end-point code, at which point their direction is explicit? -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
