On Monday 17 August 2015 11:31:51 andy pugh wrote: > On 17 August 2015 at 15:59, Kenneth Lerman <ler...@se-ltd.com> wrote: > > Now all we need is a hal component that can convert a pin value into > > a named parameter value (and vice versa). That would become a place > > where the integrator and user meet. > > That would have the same (or worse) problems with the HAL value and > the interpreter value getting out of synch. > > It seems to me that if everyone hates the current capability then it > should be removed.
No. -1. > > The current limbo-state of being there if you turn it on, but in > danger of disappearing, seems the worst of all positions. +1, now that I am used to it in the 2.8-pre, I have actually put stuff in the .ini that was not previously there, and then used the hal syntax to put it into effect. I find it handier than cold, bottled beer. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
