On 11/14/2016 08:20 AM, dragon wrote: > That was exactly my plan as well. Use a sub to make it more in line with > the way that linuxCNC already does things. > > There have been a few attempts at g71 in the past, but they were all > half-baked from what I could find. None that I found implemented g70. > They were also very 'hacky' in the way that they tried to use line > numbers. I personally feel that the fix for that is to use an o-sub. > > The big question is, if it is done as a remap will it get distributed?
I really like the g-code syntax you (Todd/Dragon and Andy) are talking about, using o-subs instead of line numbers for the profile. I think remap might be a good way to prototype it, and it could be distributed (like Sam says) as one of the remap examples. In this format it would be useful to anyone who did the work of integrating that remap code with their own machine config. But i think the end goal should be inclusion into the C++ code inside the interpreter itself, so that it's available to all users with no setup required. This is just one dude's opinion, take it with a grain of salt since it didn't come with an offer to help do the work! -- Sebastian Kuzminsky ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
