________________________________
>I think remap might be a good way to prototype it, and it could be
>distributed (like Sam says) as one of the remap examples. In this
>format it would be useful to anyone who did the work of integrating that
>remap code with their own machine config.
>But i think the end goal should be inclusion into the C++ code inside
>the interpreter itself, so that it's available to all users with no
>setup required.
How difficult would it be to modify linuxcnc to use remapped Gcode automatically
if it is placed in a particular folder and that folder is distributed?
I see a great service to integrators if gcode routines (particularly canned
cycles)
are written in python / O codes.
Is there a real world difference (to users) if the interpreter uses c++ or
python?
I assume the interpreter would take a little longer if it uses python but it is
usually miles
ahead of the actual machine.
Is there any developer reason not to use python coded cycles as 'standard &
distributed'?
Chris M
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
